← Back to dashboard

5G Service Index: Methodology & Benchmarks

16/ 100

Bainbridge Island ranks 336th of 394 Washington places (1,000+ residents) and 59th of 61 places of similar size (15,000–40,000 residents).

Data: FCC National Broadband Map, Dec 31, 2025 filings · Analysis: Oct 12, 2026

What the score measures

The 5G Service Index compares how well 5G mobile service reaches the places where residents live, relative to every other Washington community. It uses the coverage that AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon each report to the FCC. A score of 100 means a place ranks at the top of the state on every measure; 50 is roughly typical.

How it's calculated

ComponentWhat it measuresWeight
In-vehicleShare of residents with 5G at 35/3 Mbps strong enough to use in a moving vehicle, from any carrier40%
OutdoorShare of residents with 5G at 35/3 Mbps outdoors, from any carrier20%
ChoiceShare of residents with in-vehicle 35/3 Mbps 5G from two or more carriers20%
FloorShare of residents with 5G at 7/1 Mbps in-vehicle, from any carrier20%

Each component is converted to a percentile among Washington places, then combined using the weights above. In-vehicle coverage carries the most weight because it is the stricter standard and the best available stand-in for reliable everyday service, including indoors. 35/3 Mbps is the FCC's own 5G benchmark.

Coverage is weighted by population, not land area, so the score reflects where people live. 2020 Census block populations are spread across the FCC's standard hexagon grid (about 0.1 km² per hexagon) and matched to each carrier's reported coverage.

The weights and components were set before any results were calculated, and the same method is applied to every place.

Benchmark comparison

Ten comparison communities: Kitsap neighbors, other island or water-separated communities, and similar-sized Puget Sound cities.

Mill Creek
77
Oak Harbor
62
Bremerton
47
Gig Harbor
47
Mercer Island
40
Poulsbo
34
Port Orchard
25
Silverdale
24
Vashon
17
Bainbridge Island
16
Anacortes
13

Dashed line: Washington median (53)

Mill Creek777688%100%45%100%
Oak Harbor6214685%100%70%90%
Bremerton4721277%99%38%89%
Gig Harbor4721381%97%27%94%
Mercer Island4024263%99%36%94%
Poulsbo3427666%93%30%88%
Port Orchard2530656%95%17%74%
Silverdale2431152%95%18%70%
Vashon1733240%90%13%56%
Bainbridge Island1633638%83%15%54%
Anacortes1335233%77%8%56%
Washington median place53—77%99%34%94%
Similar-size median (15k–40k)——80%100%40%97%

Coverage columns are percent of residents.

About 38% of Bainbridge residents live where any carrier reports in-vehicle-grade 5G, compared with about 80% in a typical Washington community of similar size. Island and water-separated communities tend to score lower, which points to terrain, water crossings, and tower siting as shared challenges.

Does the result depend on the weights?

No. Bainbridge's position stays near the bottom however the index is built.

VersionState rank (of 394)Similar-size rank (of 61)
Primary weights (40/20/20/20)33659
Equal weights33759
In-vehicle only33859
Outdoor only35259
Choice only28558
Floor only34560
Land area instead of population36459

Validation and limitations

Validation: Calculated by land area, the same method reproduces the FCC's published coverage figures for all 639 Washington places (correlation 0.99 or higher; median difference 0.0 points), so results are consistent with the National Broadband Map.

Limitations:

  • Coverage is predicted by each carrier's own model, not measured. Real-world service may be worse.
  • The FCC does not report indoor coverage.
  • An area without 5G may still have 4G LTE service.
  • Signal strength values differ between carriers' models, so the index compares coverage areas, not signal levels.

Data sources

Download full results for 394 Washington places (CSV)